OCOscar Curi
Research portfolio

Portfolio construction · Separate PM layer

Model long/short portfolio

A portfolio-level view of sizing, exposures, concentration, attribution, drawdown, liquidity, and the rules that connect security research to book-level risk.

Coverage Universe companies are real. Flagship research, prices, estimates, performance and research claims shown in sample sections remain fictional placeholders used to demonstrate the research architecture.
01

Risk / exposure dashboard

Gross exposure

68%

Net exposure

18%

Long exposure

43%

Short exposure

−25%

Beta

0.34

Top sector

18%

Top 5 concentration

21%

Current drawdown

−1.4%

Model volatility

8.6%

Long contribution

+2.4%

Short contribution

+0.8%

Positions

12

Demo figures only. No actual capital, performance, or market exposure is represented.

02

Active positions

CompanyTickerL/SInitial dateEntryReferenceTargetWeightP&LCatalystConviction
Northstar TechnologiesNSTXLONG12 Jun 2026$44$48$633.0%+0.27%FY27 margin guideHigh
Redwood ConsumerRWDCSHORT02 Jul 2026$76$72$54−2.0%+0.11%Guide resetMedium
Meridian LogisticsMRDNLONG21 Jul 2026$31$33$402.0%+0.13%Contract renewalsMedium
Atlas HomeATLSSHORT09 Aug 2026$58$61$45−1.5%−0.08%Inventory normalizationMedium
03

Exposure & performance

Sector exposure

Long and short balance

Demo · % NAV

Portfolio performance

Cumulative model return

Demo · not actual

Factor exposure

Quality +0.22 · Momentum −0.08

Concentration

Top position 3.0% · Top 5 21%

Drawdown

Current −1.4% · Max demo −2.3%

P&L attribution

Long +2.4% · Short +0.8%

04

Portfolio construction framework

Position sizing

Base weights reflect thesis confidence, expected asymmetry, catalyst timing, liquidity, and correlation.

Risk budgeting

Single-name loss limits and scenario-weighted downside constrain initial and maximum sizing.

Correlation & concentration

Theme, sector, factor, and catalyst overlap matter alongside nominal position count.

Hedging framework

Index, sector, and factor hedges are separated from alpha shorts and reviewed for basis risk.

Liquidity & exits

Sizing is bounded by realistic time-to-exit; add, trim, and kill rules are explicit before entry.

Add rules

  • Variant evidence strengthens
  • Expected return expands
  • Portfolio correlation remains acceptable

Trim rules

  • Target gap compresses
  • Risk concentration rises
  • Catalyst timing extends

Exit rules

  • Kill criterion is met
  • Thesis is fully priced
  • Superior use of risk emerges
05

Portfolio post-mortem

Outcome

Sample portfolio remains open

Attribution

Separate selection, sizing, factor, and timing

Process review

Record avoidable concentration and hedge errors

Changes

Translate lessons into explicit portfolio rules